» Tuesday, July 4, 2006Information Commissioner
Asked whether Downing Street had any plans to publish details following the Information Commissioner’s suggestion that the Prime Minister’s meetings with Rupert Murdoch could be listed, the PMOS said that he did not think that was official yet but we would obviously consider carefully what the Commissioner said. Asked why the government was resisting, the PMOS said that it was important that the Prime Minister be able to have private conversations with individuals, as had been the case for any Prime Minister. Put that it was the fact of the meeting not the conversation that was of public interest, the PMOS said that it was still important that the Prime Minister could have private conversations with individuals without having them listed every time, and that included the media, even the ones present in this briefing room. Briefing took place at 16:00 | Search for related news Original PMOS briefings are © Crown Copyright. Crown Copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the Queen's Printer for Scotland. Click-use licence number C02W0004089. Material is reproduced from the original 10 Downing Street source, but may not be the most up-to-date version of the briefings, which might be revised at the original source. Users should check with the original source in case of revisions. Comments are © Copyright contributors. Everything else is © Copyright Downing Street Says. |
The unofficial site which lets you comment on the UK Prime Minister's official briefings. About us...
Search
Supported byRecent Briefings
Archives
LinksSyndicate (RSS/XML)CreditsEnquiriesContact Sam Smith. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
if he has anything to hide there shouldnt be a problem
Comment by neil scott — 28 Dec 2006 on 1:23 pm | Linkif he has anything to hide there shouldnt be a problem
Comment by neil scott — 28 Dec 2006 on 1:23 pm | Linknothing to hide,no problem
Comment by neil scott — 28 Dec 2006 on 1:25 pm | Linkhe works for the people,he should answer to the people.
Comment by neil scott — 28 Dec 2006 on 1:26 pm | Link