» Monday, May 22, 2006

Iraq

Asked if it was a risk to say this was a new beginning for Iraq given that the violence was likely to continue and put to him that we had had "new beginnings" before, the Prime Minister’s Official Spokesman (PMOS) said that first and foremost it was not us who was saying this was a new beginning, it was the representatives of the 12,191,000 Iraqis who had elected them. The reason it was a new beginning was that for the first time the Iraqis had a truly representative, democratically elected government which, as the Prime Minister said, was writing the next chapter in the history of Iraq. Furthermore, as the Prime Minister set out, if people were worried that their section of the community might be excluded, they could now lay those concerns to rest. Everybody was now represented on the Government. So people had a choice, they could join the politics, which was working, or they could continue with the violence. But as the Iraqi Prime Minister has made very clear, both publicly and privately, the Iraqi Government with the increasing ability of its forces would stamp hard on those who wished to continue with violence. So it was new era.

Asked if the Prime Minister would discuss the violence in the South of Iraq with his Iraqi counterpart, the PMOS said that in terms of Basra and the south it was naturally part of the discussions. Prime Minister al-Maliki confirmed that a high level Iraqi delegation would be going to Basra to have talks there. This had been outlined in the joint statement we had issued this morning. Asked who the delegation would be talking to, the PMOS said that they would be talking to the community at large in Basra and they would be using their contacts, within that community at large, to talk to who they needed to talk to.

Asked to comment on reports that British troops were expected to be out of Iraq by 2010, the PMOS said that the key word that Prime Minister al-Maliki used in the meeting was that the main criterian was the "readiness" of the Iraq troops. As he had said in the press conference, the Iraqi government wanted to begin the process of provinces coming under Iraqi control in June. They wanted to implement that as quickly as possible. However that depended on two factors. First was the overall level of security and second was the readiness of the Iraqi forces and we would work with them to help that be achieved.

Asked if there might be confusion between talking about Iraqi-isation and the troops not being ready at the same time, the PMOS said that there was a difference between Iraqi troops taking over in provinces which were largely peaceful already, which of 18 provinces, 14 were, and taking over completely. This was not something which changed over-night. It was a progression and a progression dependent on the readiness of the Iraqi forces. As the communiqué said, the words we actually used were "much" rather than "most" of Iraq by the end of the year to be under control of the Iraqi forces. That was the ambition, but it would depend on circumstances on the ground.

Asked about the direction of "Iraqi-isation" and whether there were differing opinions about what it meant, the PMOS said that both Governments new where we were in terms of the process and the strategy. We had set out the process of Iraqi-isation two years ago. He had briefed it in April 2004 and got 3 lines in the Observer, he had tried again on the Monday and got slightly more coverage at that time. This was a strategy we laid down two years ago. This was a strategy we had been fulfilling since then. Iraqi-isation in terms of politics and enabling democratic elections in Iraq, which 12, 191,000 Iraqs participated in. We had achieved that and now equally we were addressing the security side as well. That was the strategy, so in terms of support for the Iraqi Government, it was fulfilling that strategy.

Asked what contact had taken place between the Prime Minister and the Bush administration and what the next step for Iraq was, the PMOS said that the Prime Minister spoke to President Bush on a regular basis on Iraq and a number of other issues and they were well aware of each others mind. The important point was that in terms of the Iraqi Government, it had three priorities. Firstly it was a process of national reconciliation, secondly it was a process of economic recovery, repairing the infrastructure getting the economy up and running, and the third priority was the international compact using the international support on issues such as debt but also on issues such as expertise. There were many different ways in which the international community could help apart from of course the security presence which we had in place. Asked about the relationship between the UK and the United States, the PMOS said that there were many facets of the relationship between the UK and the United States and we would be dealing with the issues in the round rather than in a particular meeting.

Briefing took place at 14:00 | Search for related news

No Comments »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Post a public comment

(You must give an email address, but it will not be displayed to the public.)
(You may give your website, and it will be displayed to the public.)

Comments:

This is not a way of contacting the Prime Minister. If you would like to contact the Prime Minister, go to the 10 Downing Street official site.

Privacy note: Shortly after posting, your name and comment will be displayed on the site. This means that people searching for your name on the Internet will be able to find and read your comment.

Downing Street Says...

The unofficial site which lets you comment on the UK Prime Minister's official briefings. About us...

Search


May 2006
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
« Apr   Jun »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  

Supported by

mySociety.org

Disruptive Proactivity

Recent Briefings


Archives

Links

Syndicate (RSS/XML)

Credits

Enquiries

Contact Sam Smith.

This site is powered by WordPress. Theme by Jag Singh