<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Foreign Prisoners</title>
	<link>http://downingstreetsays.com/briefings/2006/04/25/2587</link>
	<description>Every day the Prime Minister's Spokesman meets a small coterie of political journalists known as 'the lobby' for a topical chat, or 'briefing'.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 00:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: shane ie</title>
		<link>http://downingstreetsays.com/briefings/2006/04/25/2587#comment-4751</link>
		<author>shane ie</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Oct 2006 00:20:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://downingstreetsays.com/briefings/2006/04/25/2587#comment-4751</guid>
		<description>what about prisoner who have there younge child here , have no on to go back to in thtre country.
will the goverment think aboutv the small child ? 
that is may only concren, and also if the person in prison came in this country as a minor case, and still await answers from the home office .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what about prisoner who have there younge child here , have no on to go back to in thtre country.<br />
will the goverment think aboutv the small child ?<br />
that is may only concren, and also if the person in prison came in this country as a minor case, and still await answers from the home office .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shane ie</title>
		<link>http://downingstreetsays.com/briefings/2006/04/25/2587#comment-4750</link>
		<author>shane ie</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Oct 2006 00:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://downingstreetsays.com/briefings/2006/04/25/2587#comment-4750</guid>
		<description>what about prisoner who have there younge child here , have no on to go back to in thtre country.
will the goverment think aboutv the small child ? 
that is may only concren, and also if the person in prison came in this country as a minor case, and still await answers from the home office .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what about prisoner who have there younge child here , have no on to go back to in thtre country.<br />
will the goverment think aboutv the small child ?<br />
that is may only concren, and also if the person in prison came in this country as a minor case, and still await answers from the home office .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Unsworth</title>
		<link>http://downingstreetsays.com/briefings/2006/04/25/2587#comment-4243</link>
		<author>Chuck Unsworth</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 19:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://downingstreetsays.com/briefings/2006/04/25/2587#comment-4243</guid>
		<description>Well it must be something like watching a hippopotamus rutting - interesting but not particularly elegant and pretty distasteful generally.  I can't believe Attenborough would want to include it in his programmes.  It's a 'not before' and 'not after' watershed item.

Still today's revelations have effective neutralised two more of Tony's pals.  All credibility blown to the winds, Blair strapped to the mainmast as the great ship of State founders.  It'll be 'liferaft' next.  Who's going to get turfed out first?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well it must be something like watching a hippopotamus rutting - interesting but not particularly elegant and pretty distasteful generally.  I can&#8217;t believe Attenborough would want to include it in his programmes.  It&#8217;s a &#8216;not before&#8217; and &#8216;not after&#8217; watershed item.</p>
<p>Still today&#8217;s revelations have effective neutralised two more of Tony&#8217;s pals.  All credibility blown to the winds, Blair strapped to the mainmast as the great ship of State founders.  It&#8217;ll be &#8216;liferaft&#8217; next.  Who&#8217;s going to get turfed out first?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Huffadine</title>
		<link>http://downingstreetsays.com/briefings/2006/04/25/2587#comment-4242</link>
		<author>Roger Huffadine</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 18:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://downingstreetsays.com/briefings/2006/04/25/2587#comment-4242</guid>
		<description>And - hey guys

If Tony is too dim to have asked the obvious questions about WMD and 'battlefield weapons' then you can hardly expect one of his recruited morons to ask the obvious questions about the department that he runs.

As for two shags - I'm just gobsmacked - an attractive woman willingly decides to give that fat ugly dimwit a shag!!! - and keeps doing it for 2 years....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And - hey guys</p>
<p>If Tony is too dim to have asked the obvious questions about WMD and &#8216;battlefield weapons&#8217; then you can hardly expect one of his recruited morons to ask the obvious questions about the department that he runs.</p>
<p>As for two shags - I&#8217;m just gobsmacked - an attractive woman willingly decides to give that fat ugly dimwit a shag!!! - and keeps doing it for 2 years&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr Pooter</title>
		<link>http://downingstreetsays.com/briefings/2006/04/25/2587#comment-4240</link>
		<author>Mr Pooter</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 14:54:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://downingstreetsays.com/briefings/2006/04/25/2587#comment-4240</guid>
		<description>Two Shags and naughty foreigners on the loose - provides the Perfect Fog to hide behind if the local elections go as badly as they say they might.      </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two Shags and naughty foreigners on the loose - provides the Perfect Fog to hide behind if the local elections go as badly as they say they might.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Unsworth</title>
		<link>http://downingstreetsays.com/briefings/2006/04/25/2587#comment-4239</link>
		<author>Chuck Unsworth</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 14:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://downingstreetsays.com/briefings/2006/04/25/2587#comment-4239</guid>
		<description>Setting aside all of the preceding nonsense, presumably the PMOS believes that it is for the PAC to inform the House.  Or does he believe that a statement to the PAC is  exactly the same as a statement in the Chamber?

Since the PMOS comments above several direct contradictions of his position have emerged, and these clearly show that PMOS is either lying or is incompetent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Setting aside all of the preceding nonsense, presumably the PMOS believes that it is for the PAC to inform the House.  Or does he believe that a statement to the PAC is  exactly the same as a statement in the Chamber?</p>
<p>Since the PMOS comments above several direct contradictions of his position have emerged, and these clearly show that PMOS is either lying or is incompetent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
