<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ID cards</title>
	<link>http://downingstreetsays.com/briefings/2006/01/17/2143</link>
	<description>Every day the Prime Minister's Spokesman meets a small coterie of political journalists known as 'the lobby' for a topical chat, or 'briefing'.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 13:45:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Owen Blacker</title>
		<link>http://downingstreetsays.com/briefings/2006/01/17/2143#comment-3994</link>
		<author>Owen Blacker</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 14:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://downingstreetsays.com/briefings/2006/01/17/2143#comment-3994</guid>
		<description>&#34;If you looked at fraud, the trend in terms of private areas such as banking and the threat from terrorism these were all reasons why ID cards were becoming more, not less relevant as an issue.&#34;

And does PMOS provide any proof for that assertion?

*tumbleweed*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;If you looked at fraud, the trend in terms of private areas such as banking and the threat from terrorism these were all reasons why ID cards were becoming more, not less relevant as an issue.&quot;</p>
<p>And does PMOS provide any proof for that assertion?</p>
<p>*tumbleweed*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PapaLazzzaru</title>
		<link>http://downingstreetsays.com/briefings/2006/01/17/2143#comment-3982</link>
		<author>PapaLazzzaru</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 12:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://downingstreetsays.com/briefings/2006/01/17/2143#comment-3982</guid>
		<description>&#34;in terms of the cost we continued to stick by the costs produced by the Home Office&#34;

Which were a wild stab in the dark, and everyone knows it, so why doesn't the PMOS just shut up?! The reason the Lords rejected the bill was because of lack of clarity on the cost; judging by the PMOS words, if it was up to him he'd turn the bill straight back round and chuck it back at the Lords. What the fuck's the point in that?!?! 

Mark my words people; there is an agenda at work here and it has nothing to do with the electorate of the United kingdom. And you only have yourselves to blame when it all comes to pass, for the signs and all the evidence were there for long enough and most of you did nothing about it, except writing a blank cheque for Bliar the Illuminati Stooge to put in place the mechanisms for One World Government. It ain't coming? I'm talking shite? Really? Notice how the single EU seems to be still on track - even though it was voted out of the water. Keep waiting...!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;in terms of the cost we continued to stick by the costs produced by the Home Office&quot;</p>
<p>Which were a wild stab in the dark, and everyone knows it, so why doesn&#8217;t the PMOS just shut up?! The reason the Lords rejected the bill was because of lack of clarity on the cost; judging by the PMOS words, if it was up to him he&#8217;d turn the bill straight back round and chuck it back at the Lords. What the fuck&#8217;s the point in that?!?! </p>
<p>Mark my words people; there is an agenda at work here and it has nothing to do with the electorate of the United kingdom. And you only have yourselves to blame when it all comes to pass, for the signs and all the evidence were there for long enough and most of you did nothing about it, except writing a blank cheque for Bliar the Illuminati Stooge to put in place the mechanisms for One World Government. It ain&#8217;t coming? I&#8217;m talking shite? Really? Notice how the single EU seems to be still on track - even though it was voted out of the water. Keep waiting&#8230;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
