» Monday, May 16, 2005

Anti-Social Behaviour

Asked about the Government’s plans to tackle anti-social behaviour in the light of Hazel Blears comments, the PMOS said that the important thing, as the Prime Minister had said last week, was to have a national debate on the kind of measures and signals that we sent to those who showed disrespect or broke the law. There were various different aspects and factors related to that. We had dealt with some of these already through the use of ASBOs. Some of them we would be dealing with in future legislation, such as through the ability to close down pubs where there were problems. Others required a debate, such as in education, with head teachers about discipline. Another aspect of it was how to send the strongest possible signals to those who had been convicted that the community as a whole disapproved of their behaviour. It was in that spirit of debate that Hazel Blears made her comments.

Put to him that this was all rhetoric, the PMOS pointed out that people had said this about ASBOs and it had turned out to be the reverse. What ASBOs had shown was that an idea which people at the time were sceptical about actually could work, and did work. It was important to see this as part of a continuum of ministerial thinking and Government thinking about how we dealt with this issue. The Prime Minister was deadly serious about this.

Asked how the Prime Minister hoped to start the debate, the PMOS said that there was a national debate going on and therefore it was important that we considered a range of different proposals. Asked whether Hazel Blears had been describing Government policy, the PMOS said that she had been contributing to the national debate in her capacity as a Government minister. Put to him that the Government had a record of making announcements and then not seeing them through, the PMOS said that if you examined the Government’s record on this particular area it was a good one. The number of Anti-Social Behaviour Orders issues between April 1999 and September 2004 were 3826. There was something which went from being an idea, to a proposal, to a being a policy, to being implemented on the ground and highly popular. What we had to do was think through carefully how we as a community dealt with a culture of disrespect. It was important therefore all contributions to that debate, from Government ministers, the public, and those involved on the front line were included. If anyone was suggesting that the government came out with ideas and never followed through, he would suggest that they were wrong as his figures showed.

Questioned further about the thinking behind this, the PMOS said that the important point first of all, was to see this as part and parcel of the Prime Minister’s thinking for a considerable amount of time. Anybody who looked at the Prime Minister’s record would acknowledge that this was an issue he had been thinking about and acting on since even before he became Prime Minister. It was not something that had been parachuted in from nowhere, it had to be placed in that context. Similarly the Government had taken various measures such as ASBOs, licensing legislation, closing crack houses and so forth. These were all elements of the same approach. As the Prime Minister had said last week, the Government would hold a debate to see how to take this agenda forward. We needed to consult head-teachers, community leaders and if other politicians wanted to contribute to the debate then it was open to them to do so.

Briefing took place at 6:00 | Search for related news

3 Comments »

  1. As regards this essay i think that this is very good and it has got a lot of information inside and a very good conclusion. Well done.

    Comment by Sonila Haskaj — 8 May 2006 on 4:26 pm | Link
  2. As regards this essay i think that this is very good and it has got a lot of information inside and a very good conclusion. Well done.

    Comment by Sonila Haskaj — 8 May 2006 on 4:26 pm | Link
  3. As regards this essay i think that this is very good and it has got a lot of information inside and a very good conclusion. Well done.

    Comment by Sonila Haskaj — 8 May 2006 on 4:27 pm | Link

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Post a public comment

(You must give an email address, but it will not be displayed to the public.)
(You may give your website, and it will be displayed to the public.)

Comments:

This is not a way of contacting the Prime Minister. If you would like to contact the Prime Minister, go to the 10 Downing Street official site.

Privacy note: Shortly after posting, your name and comment will be displayed on the site. This means that people searching for your name on the Internet will be able to find and read your comment.

Downing Street Says...

The unofficial site which lets you comment on the UK Prime Minister's official briefings. About us...

Search


May 2005
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
« Apr   Jun »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  

Supported by

mySociety.org

Disruptive Proactivity

Recent Briefings


Archives

Links

Syndicate (RSS/XML)

Credits

Enquiries

Contact Sam Smith.

This site is powered by WordPress. Theme by Jag Singh