» Monday, April 4, 2005

Pope’s Funeral/Royal Wedding

Asked if the Prime Minister would be attending the Pope’s funeral, the Prime Minister’s Official Spokesman (PMOS) confirmed that the Prime Minister would be attending. Asked if Mrs Blair was attending and whether there had been discussions between Downing Street and Clarence House, the PMOS said that in terms of Mrs Blair we would let people know nearer the time and in terms of discussions it was obvious that we had asked to be kept informed but the decision on the wedding had been one for Clarence House, and one for Clarence House alone to take. Asked if Downing Street indicated that the Pope’s funeral might be regarded as a more important event, the PMOS said that he would put it the other way round, Clarence House were fully aware of the significance of the Pope’s funeral and therefore it was part of the decision making process, though it was for Clarence House to speak for itself. Asked if the Prince of Wales would be attending the funeral, the PMOS said that his understanding was the Prince was attending but again that was a matter for Clarence House to confirm.

Asked if it was constitutionally required that the Prime Minister attended the funeral or whether it was just that he personally really wanted to attend, the PMOS said that in terms of the response to the death of the Pope and in terms of what the Prime Minister said on Saturday and again yesterday, it was the Prime Minster’s view that the Pope was as a truly world figure who had made an historic contribution to the world. It was also clear in the way in which others countries had said that they would be represented at the funeral as well. So in terms of the significance of the Pope’s death that was clear. When you had a Pope who had served as long as this Pope had done, when you had a Pope who was revered publicly world wide as this Pope was and who had made a clear contribution to the future of the world then this Prime Minister believed it was the right thing to do. Asked again whether it was a constitutional requirement, the PMOS said that, as he understood it on previous occasions that had not been the precedent.

Asked if on Saturday the Prime Minister was still attending the same bit of the Royal wedding as previously imagined for Friday, the PMOS said that was correct. He would be attending the blessing in the Chapel, whatever the position was previously it was unchanged other than the date. However at this stage Clarence House had yet to announce publicly further details. Asked when the Prime Minister decided that he was going to the Pope’s funeral, PMOS said that in terms of the decision a decision had not had to be made until Clarence House had announced the postponement of the wedding.

In response to the suggestion ITN that this was a belittling of the Royal Family and the heir to the throne, the PMOS said that it was Clarence House who had taken the decision to postpone the wedding and they had done so, in their own words, because of the sensitivities surrounding other events, in other words the Pope’s funeral. Accordingly the Prime Minister was glad that he was able to attend both events. Asked if there was contact between Clarence House and Downing Street in advance of the decision, the PMOS said, as he had earlier, that we had asked to be kept informed about what the decision was going to be, but it was very much their decision.

Briefing took place at 15:45 | Search for related news


  1. "…and who had made a clear contribution to the future of the world then this Prime Minister believed it was the right thing to do…"

    Sadly this is something the PM will never aspire to; his only contributions to the future of this world have been negative ones. Widespread death and destruction in Iraq and the Balkans. Don’t go, Tony; let a truly great man go to his eternal rest untainted by association to people like yourself and your best mate Brush.

    Comment by PapaLazzzaru — 5 Apr 2005 on 12:41 pm | Link
  2. I see that the cost of policing this wedding is likely to be increased because of rearrangement. No doubt the taxpayer will be expected to foot this bill – although the police have supposedly asked the Palace for a "donation" (\xA350?!), a palace mouthpiece (or was it Clarence House; they’re all the same to me) apparently said "policing is a matter for the Home Office". Translation; sod off, get the plebs to pay. Disgraceful. We knew all along that the taxpayer was likely to foot the bill one way or another and here is the clearest indication yet; and that’s only what we KNOW about.

    Comment by PapaLazzzaru — 6 Apr 2005 on 11:06 am | Link
  3. As usual, Joe Public picks up the bill. And this is after the Heir to the Throne’s snotty-nosed performance at Klosters as well. Sort of Pay and Display, really – we pay, they display. I bet he was extremely pissed off when the Pope croaked. It must have ruined at least a couple of days’ skiing.

    Still, at least this is the cheap version. Imagine what it would cost if Charlie somehow managed to wangle a full church do at Westminster. The list of guests is very entertaining and it’s interesting that at least one European Royal has found something much more important to do – opening a new branch of IKEA in Japan!

    Comment by Chuck Unsworth — 7 Apr 2005 on 3:06 pm | Link
  4. Regarding the General elections. I was advised that before voting I should question prospective m.p’s on their plans for our future. Unfortunately no mp or any of their party representatives have visited our house in either this or any other general election since we came to this area in 1960. On Merseyside we were reguarly canvassed for both local and governmental elections. The only occasion I have been asked to vote was a phonecall from the the labour candidate as it was nearly time to close the boxes and I had been unable to walk to the voting office. That was in the 1990’s. Perhaps the people conserned are afraid of what we might ask.

    Comment by Tunley — 1 May 2005 on 9:08 pm | Link

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Post a public comment

(You must give an email address, but it will not be displayed to the public.)
(You may give your website, and it will be displayed to the public.)


This is not a way of contacting the Prime Minister. If you would like to contact the Prime Minister, go to the 10 Downing Street official site.

Privacy note: Shortly after posting, your name and comment will be displayed on the site. This means that people searching for your name on the Internet will be able to find and read your comment.

Downing Street Says...

The unofficial site which lets you comment on the UK Prime Minister's official briefings. About us...


April 2005
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
« Mar   May »

Supported by


Disruptive Proactivity

Recent Briefings



Syndicate (RSS/XML)



Contact Sam Smith.

This site is powered by WordPress. Theme by Jag Singh