» Monday, March 7, 2005Five Year Plan
Asked to clarify what a Five Year Plan was, and were they backed by documents, the PMOS said that if the journalist examined various departments’ Five Year Plans, he would see the depth of the plan. The PMOS explained that it was work that was developing an overall strategy for five years within a department, and setting that out. It had been set out to Parliament, and the statement to Parliament was what the plan contained. It was a clear vision of each subject matter of the Government’s approach. Briefing took place at 11:00 | Search for related news Original PMOS briefings are © Crown Copyright. Crown Copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the Queen's Printer for Scotland. Click-use licence number C02W0004089. Material is reproduced from the original 10 Downing Street source, but may not be the most up-to-date version of the briefings, which might be revised at the original source. Users should check with the original source in case of revisions. Comments are © Copyright contributors. Everything else is © Copyright Downing Street Says. |
The unofficial site which lets you comment on the UK Prime Minister's official briefings. About us...
Search
Supported byRecent Briefings
Archives
LinksSyndicate (RSS/XML)CreditsEnquiriesContact Sam Smith. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ooh! A Five Year Plan! How original!
Comment by Chris Lightfoot — 7 Mar 2005 on 11:01 pm | Linkhttp://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/RUSfive.htm
In a fast changing World forward planning is "what’s for lunch?"
- my quote as a software developer.
A 5 year plan is complete b*ll*cks when governments only sit for 4 years.
Why are they wasting my taxes?
Comment by Roger Huffadine — 7 Mar 2005 on 11:15 pm | Link"Asked to clarify what a Five Year Plan was, and were they backed by documents, the PMOS said that if the journalist examined various departments’ Five Year Plans, he would see the depth of the plan."
So no actual explanation at all, just a rather oblique reference to the depth of the plans, as though that’s enough for any idiot to understand how that depth of planning makes the plan a Five Year Plan. What a load of old tosh!
Comment by PapaLazzzaru — 8 Mar 2005 on 3:09 am | LinkSounds like something out of Monty Python, dunnit?! "Five is the number, and the number is Five. Count ye not to Three or Four unless thou then proceedeth to Five…"
Comment by PapaLazzzaru — 8 Mar 2005 on 3:10 am | Link