<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Missile Defence</title>
	<link>http://downingstreetsays.com/briefings/2004/10/18/952</link>
	<description>Every day the Prime Minister's Spokesman meets a small coterie of political journalists known as 'the lobby' for a topical chat, or 'briefing'.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 17:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Lightfoot</title>
		<link>http://downingstreetsays.com/briefings/2004/10/18/952#comment-2270</link>
		<author>Chris Lightfoot</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2004 17:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://downingstreetsays.com/briefings/2004/10/18/952#comment-2270</guid>
		<description>I suspect there's a crossed wire here somewhere.

My understanding is that one of the RADARs for the ABM system is to be based in this country (at Fylingdales as an upgrade to the existing BMEWS site, I guess), but not the interceptor missiles themselves. Careful observers will note that this means that we will be a target for enemies of the US (who might want to blow up the early-warning system before launching their missiles at targets in the US mainland), but will be denied any protection that the system could offer.

That said, the missile defence system isn't going to work anyway (it's too hard a problem, basically), and it's not like not building the RADAR will make other people dislike this country any less, so it doesn't really matter anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspect there&#8217;s a crossed wire here somewhere.</p>
<p>My understanding is that one of the RADARs for the ABM system is to be based in this country (at Fylingdales as an upgrade to the existing BMEWS site, I guess), but not the interceptor missiles themselves. Careful observers will note that this means that we will be a target for enemies of the US (who might want to blow up the early-warning system before launching their missiles at targets in the US mainland), but will be denied any protection that the system could offer.</p>
<p>That said, the missile defence system isn&#8217;t going to work anyway (it&#8217;s too hard a problem, basically), and it&#8217;s not like not building the RADAR will make other people dislike this country any less, so it doesn&#8217;t really matter anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Huffadine</title>
		<link>http://downingstreetsays.com/briefings/2004/10/18/952#comment-2268</link>
		<author>Roger Huffadine</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2004 16:33:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://downingstreetsays.com/briefings/2004/10/18/952#comment-2268</guid>
		<description>OK so the reports were 'rubbish' but what about answering the question?

Are there to be any additional US missiles based in the UK?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK so the reports were &#8216;rubbish&#8217; but what about answering the question?</p>
<p>Are there to be any additional US missiles based in the UK?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
