» Monday, October 18, 2004Missile Defence
Asked for a reaction to reports suggesting that the Government had struck a secret deal with the US to install a missile system in the UK, the PMOS said that the reports were rubbish. Briefing took place at 11:00 | Search for related news Original PMOS briefings are © Crown Copyright. Crown Copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the Queen's Printer for Scotland. Click-use licence number C02W0004089. Material is reproduced from the original 10 Downing Street source, but may not be the most up-to-date version of the briefings, which might be revised at the original source. Users should check with the original source in case of revisions. Comments are © Copyright contributors. Everything else is © Copyright Downing Street Says. |
The unofficial site which lets you comment on the UK Prime Minister's official briefings. About us...
Search
Supported byRecent Briefings
Archives
LinksSyndicate (RSS/XML)CreditsEnquiriesContact Sam Smith. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
OK so the reports were ‘rubbish’ but what about answering the question?
Are there to be any additional US missiles based in the UK?
Comment by Roger Huffadine — 18 Oct 2004 on 4:33 pm | LinkI suspect there’s a crossed wire here somewhere.
My understanding is that one of the RADARs for the ABM system is to be based in this country (at Fylingdales as an upgrade to the existing BMEWS site, I guess), but not the interceptor missiles themselves. Careful observers will note that this means that we will be a target for enemies of the US (who might want to blow up the early-warning system before launching their missiles at targets in the US mainland), but will be denied any protection that the system could offer.
That said, the missile defence system isn’t going to work anyway (it’s too hard a problem, basically), and it’s not like not building the RADAR will make other people dislike this country any less, so it doesn’t really matter anyway.
Comment by Chris Lightfoot — 18 Oct 2004 on 5:37 pm | Link