» Monday, August 2, 2004

John Scarlett

Asked to confirm or deny allegations that John Scarlett had sent an e-mail to the Iraq Survey Group on March 8 asking them to beef up their report on Iraq’s WMD, the PMS said there was no question of Her Majesty’s Government, or any Departments agencies – including the JIC and its then chairman John Scarlett – seeking to mislead the ISG in anyway. Asked to deny categorically that Mr Scarlett had sent the e-mail on 8 March, the PMS repeated that she would deny that there had been any attempts to mislead any of the relevant organisations or committees. Asked if the Prime Minister continued to believe that it had been a good idea to appoint Mr Scarlett as the new head of MI6, the PMS said yes.

Briefing took place at 11:00 | Search for related news

4 Comments »

  1. In exactly the same way that HMG would never, NEVER stoop to doing anything illegal at the UN, like bugging offices or anything like that… "Oh, the cheque’s in the post…"

    Comment by PapaLazzzaru — 3 Aug 2004 on 10:03 pm | Link
  2. Tell the president to come clean.

    Comment by Robert Woodroof — 17 Jun 2005 on 3:41 am | Link
  3. So, the e-mail was sent, but the intention was not to seek to mislead.

    Presumably the PMOS is completely telepathic in that she knows precisely what Scarlett’s intentions were.

    Perhaps the intention was to mislead others, not the ISG – such as Parliament, the entire UK population, the UN etc.

    I’m profoundly impressed by the natural skills and talents of this lady. She should go far.

    Comment by Chuck Unsworth — 17 Jun 2005 on 10:43 am | Link
  4. News Released: August 30th, 2005

    Preventx helps to cut UK Industry losing billions to drink and drugs

    A recent report shows that over \xA312 billion is lost each year to drink and drugs in the UK work industry.

    PROMIS, a leading addiction and recovery centre found that 75% of alcoholics in full-time employment, and up to 15% of those in upper management, are reliant upon drink and drugs.

    These findings are mirrored by a 2003 national newspaper report where it was found that around 14 million working days are lost every year through alcohol and drug related illnesses, and people with substance abuse problems are between two and eight times more likely to be absent from work for more than a week than those without such problems.

    As well as the financial loss, there are other issues involved. Addiction in the work place can lead to low productivity and poor performance. Alcohol and drug abuse accounts for 25% of all accidents at work.

    In 1991, the Cannon Street rail crash led to the introduction of the Transport and Works Act 1992, which made it a criminal act for transport workers to be unfit because of drink and drugs. And now many employers, particularly those who work in safety critical jobs, are looking at drug testing as a justifiable procedure.

    Drug testing in the workplace is common in the USA, and there have been suggestions from senior UK policy makers that it should be more widely adopted by UK companies.

    Preventx, a north east-based drug testing kit distributor, has devised a number of drug testing kits for employers to be able to test their workforce.
    Polly Everette, Preventx managing director said:
    \x93The aim of drug testing in the work place isn\x92t to catch people out, but to give help and assistance before it\x92s too late. Employers should have policies in place whereby if an employee did test positive, they can receive help and counseling immediately.\x94

    She added:
    \x93The majority of the UK’s working population will use mind-altering drugs at some point. These drugs may be legal, illegal or prescription, but all can potentially impact on professional competence and safety.\x94

    For further information on drugs and alcohol in the work place, you can visit the government\x92s online website at http://www.drugs.gov.uk and for information on Preventx drug testing kits click on http://www.preventx.co.uk

    Comment by tom fotheringham — 30 Aug 2005 on 11:29 pm | Link

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Post a public comment

(You must give an email address, but it will not be displayed to the public.)
(You may give your website, and it will be displayed to the public.)

Comments:

This is not a way of contacting the Prime Minister. If you would like to contact the Prime Minister, go to the 10 Downing Street official site.

Privacy note: Shortly after posting, your name and comment will be displayed on the site. This means that people searching for your name on the Internet will be able to find and read your comment.

Downing Street Says...

The unofficial site which lets you comment on the UK Prime Minister's official briefings. About us...

Search


August 2004
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
« Jul   Sep »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  

Supported by

mySociety.org

Disruptive Proactivity

Recent Briefings


Archives

Links

Syndicate (RSS/XML)

Credits

Enquiries

Contact Sam Smith.

This site is powered by WordPress. Theme by Jag Singh