<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: European Constitution</title>
	<link>http://downingstreetsays.com/briefings/2004/04/21/453</link>
	<description>Every day the Prime Minister's Spokesman meets a small coterie of political journalists known as 'the lobby' for a topical chat, or 'briefing'.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 04:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Lodjer</title>
		<link>http://downingstreetsays.com/briefings/2004/04/21/453#comment-786</link>
		<author>Lodjer</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2004 11:47:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://downingstreetsays.com/briefings/2004/04/21/453#comment-786</guid>
		<description>&#34;the Government was not going to go into the referendum with the intention of losing it. He pointed out that a no vote would also place this country in a difficult position&#34;

That statement - coupled with the repeated refusal to entertain hypothetical situations - seems to indicate that the referendum is given not to listen to public opinion, but as a pr exersise, with &#34;yes&#34; the only reasonable vote. The whole thing has an air of inevitability about it (a little like the run up to Iraq) yet I can't help thinking the government will have to do some very fast talking to overcome the generally conservative anti-euro populace.

Unlike Iraq, and everything else, I hope Tony is right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;the Government was not going to go into the referendum with the intention of losing it. He pointed out that a no vote would also place this country in a difficult position&quot;</p>
<p>That statement - coupled with the repeated refusal to entertain hypothetical situations - seems to indicate that the referendum is given not to listen to public opinion, but as a pr exersise, with &quot;yes&quot; the only reasonable vote. The whole thing has an air of inevitability about it (a little like the run up to Iraq) yet I can&#8217;t help thinking the government will have to do some very fast talking to overcome the generally conservative anti-euro populace.</p>
<p>Unlike Iraq, and everything else, I hope Tony is right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DEGREEK</title>
		<link>http://downingstreetsays.com/briefings/2004/04/21/453#comment-785</link>
		<author>DEGREEK</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2004 22:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://downingstreetsays.com/briefings/2004/04/21/453#comment-785</guid>
		<description>What do you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uncarved Block</title>
		<link>http://downingstreetsays.com/briefings/2004/04/21/453#comment-784</link>
		<author>Uncarved Block</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2004 20:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://downingstreetsays.com/briefings/2004/04/21/453#comment-784</guid>
		<description>Michael Howard said at today's PMQs that if the referendum produced a 'no' vote he would never sign up to a European constitution.

At the last test of public opinion (the general election) people voted not to have a Conservative Government - so will Michael Howard commit himself to never allowing a Conservative Government in the future?

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael Howard said at today&#8217;s PMQs that if the referendum produced a &#8216;no&#8217; vote he would never sign up to a European constitution.</p>
<p>At the last test of public opinion (the general election) people voted not to have a Conservative Government - so will Michael Howard commit himself to never allowing a Conservative Government in the future?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
