» Monday, March 29, 2004Higher Education Bill
Asked if the Prime Minister was planning any meetings with backbench MPs in advance of the vote on the Higher Education Bill on Wednesday, the PMOS said that the Prime Minister continued to be prepared to hold whatever meetings were necessary. However, there were no specific plans in his diary to meet backbenchers at this stage. The Prime Minister continued to believe that this was a very important piece of legislation. That said, we were in no way complacent about the vote. We recognised that it would, once again, be tight. Nevertheless, he stood ready to argue the case as to why we needed top-level university education in this country that was capable of competing with the best in the world. Asked if any further concessions might be given to rebel MPs in the run-up to the vote, the PMOS said that the principles of the Bill remained clear and had been - and would continue to be - set out consistently by the Prime Minister and other Ministers when making the case for it. Briefing took place at 11:00 | Search for related news Original PMOS briefings are © Crown Copyright. Crown Copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the Queen's Printer for Scotland. Click-use licence number C02W0004089. Material is reproduced from the original 10 Downing Street source, but may not be the most up-to-date version of the briefings, which might be revised at the original source. Users should check with the original source in case of revisions. Comments are © Copyright contributors. Everything else is © Copyright Downing Street Says. |
The unofficial site which lets you comment on the UK Prime Minister's official briefings. About us...
Search
Supported byRecent Briefings
Archives
LinksSyndicate (RSS/XML)CreditsEnquiriesContact Sam Smith. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
and how many scottish mps will vote on matters that don’t concern them in order to enable tb to push thru a deeply unpopular policy?
Comment by DEGREEK — 31 Mar 2004 on 12:19 am | Link