» Thursday, March 11, 2004
Peter Foster
Asked for a reaction to the latest ‘revelations’ by Peter Foster, the Prime Minister’s Official Spokesman (PMOS) said that we had nothing to add to what we had said about Mr Foster in the past. Asked if Downing Street continued to maintain that the Prime Minister had never met Peter Foster, the PMOS said that we stood by what had been said. If journalists needed reminding, they could look it up in previous press briefing notes. Today we had other things on our mind.
Briefing took place at 15:30 | Search for related news
Original PMOS briefings are © Crown Copyright. Crown Copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the Queen's Printer for Scotland. Click-use licence number C02W0004089. Material is reproduced from the original 10 Downing Street source, but may not be the most up-to-date version of the briefings, which might be revised at the original source. Users should check with the original source in case of revisions. Comments are © Copyright contributors. Everything else is © Copyright Downing Street Says.
Search
| Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat | Sun |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Feb | Apr » | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
| 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
| 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
| 29 | 30 | 31 | ||||
Supported by
Recent Briefings
Archives
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- January 1970
Links
Syndicate (RSS/XML)
Credits
Enquiries
Contact Sam Smith.
I know Peter Foster is supposed to be trying to sell a book and therefore anything he says should be taken with a large pinch of salt, but wouldn’t it be funny if there WAS some truth in his allegations… Imagine it, Saint Tony dragged through a divorce court!
On a more serious note, surely anyone with any sense would have remembered Fosters track record from the 80s and steered well clear of him and anything to do with him in the first place. As the alleged leader of our country, you’d imagine Tony would have used a little better judgement in his personal dealings - after all, he ought to have known that there’d be SOME kind of potential fall-out.
Comment by PapaLazzzaru — 12 Mar 2004 on 9:29 am | Link