» Thursday, March 4, 2004PM Speech
Asked about the Prime Minister’s speech tomorrow, the Prime Minister’s Official Spokesman (PMOS) said that it would be a rounded speech dealing with Iraq, WMD proliferation and international security issues. Asked the purpose of the speech, the PMOS said that there had been a lot of focus on all these issues in recent months, not just in relation to Iraq, but in a wider context as well. Tomorrow’s speech would provide an opportunity to bring some of these strands together. Briefing took place at 15:45 | Search for related news Original PMOS briefings are © Crown Copyright. Crown Copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the Queen's Printer for Scotland. Click-use licence number C02W0004089. Material is reproduced from the original 10 Downing Street source, but may not be the most up-to-date version of the briefings, which might be revised at the original source. Users should check with the original source in case of revisions. Comments are © Copyright contributors. Everything else is © Copyright Downing Street Says. |
The unofficial site which lets you comment on the UK Prime Minister's official briefings. About us...
Search
Supported byRecent BriefingsArchives
LinksSyndicate (RSS/XML)CreditsEnquiriesContact Sam Smith. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The full text of the speech is here:
<a href="http://politics.guardian.co.uk/iraq/story/0,12956,1162991,00.html">http://politics.guardian.co.uk/iraq/story/0,12956,1162991,00.html</a>
It’s a masterpiece of juxtaposition — Blair talks about terrorism, then about Iraq, then about North Korea. He implies that there’s a connection between Iraq and terrorism, but obviously can’t describe such a link since no evidence has been found. Instead he uses the notion of "WMD" (a fairly meaningless term, and anyway no chemical or biological weapons have been found in Iraq and certainly nobody thought they had nuclear weapons) to link the various things together. Too me it seems a fairly poor effort.
Comment by Chris Lightfoot — 6 Mar 2004 on 12:46 pm | Link